Encyc:Community portal: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From Encyc
Blissyu2 (talk | contribs)
 
(389 intermediate revisions by 43 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I think this project has the potential to become a helpful reference, but not if it's poorly executed. Many of the recent edits are nothing more than reverts, and I think we have enough users that it's now worthwhile to find some common ground.
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
Welcome to the '''Encyc community portal'''.  This page serves as a central meeting place where Encyc users can get together and learn about current activities, group projects, and news.


We must not create a MMORPG-like set of amorphous policies like Wikipedia, but there are issues I would like to see addressed.
==Archives==
* [[Encyc:Community portal/Archive 1]]
* [[Encyc:Community portal/Archive 2]]


==Issues for discussion==
== Does this site ==
Feel free to add your own!


===What is the purpose of MediaWiki Encyc?===
...Have an interwiki table? For reference it is generally found at [[Special:Interwiki]], and only editable by adding <code>$wgGroupPermissions['emperor']['interwiki']  = true;</code> to the LocalSettings.php file. [[User:Dysklyver|Dysklyver]] ([[User talk:Dysklyver|talk]]) 09:51, 9 November 2018 (CST)
I propose that this site is best situated to document the history of Wikipedia/Wikipedia Review, the relationships of users there, and also to give articles exiled from Wikipedia a new home. The site can be used for other things, of course, but I modestly suggest that WP topics will be our core competence. [[User:One|One]] 01:04, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
:Well, Auggie no longer uses the Emperor account but let's not be too nitpicky ;) [[User:Alexander|Alexander]] ([[User talk:Alexander|talk]]) 10:14, 9 November 2018 (CST)


I disagree.  It is ultimately Emperor's decision, and if he wants it to become a kind of Wikiabuse II, then that is his business.  The reason why I wrote things here that were not encyclopaedic was really quite simple: many of my posts on Wikipedia Review going back to the beginning had been wiped, or else edited, so that people looking back couldn't get a reliable history of what had happened.  Indeed, the whole Kato/CBOrgatrope mess was so confusing that about the only people that really understood what was going on were Somey, Moulton, me and of course Kato himselfSomey and Kato of course had a vested interested in hiding it, and for whatever reason Moulton chose not to speak about it.  Most people were just clinging to a misconception of what had happened, and were basing their beliefs on lies.  So with Emperor's implied permission, I said what had happened.  What I said were not opinions, they were facts of what had happened.  Some people have since misrepresented them as opinions and in some cases even called them lies. 
::I think back when I set up the site I opted to go with the defaults rather than worrying about maintaining another tableI could look into it if you want to add something.  What site were you thinking? [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 12:34, 9 November 2018 (CST)


With that being said, once that is all tidied up properly, it would be good to have it free to describe anything, as Emperor originally wished. It's not like WP/WR issues make up the majority of articles. Oh wait, maybe they do make up slightly over 50% right now, but it doesn't need to stay that way. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 13:48, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
:::I was doing interwiki links for wikilivres.org and I was wondering what sites (if any) you guys linked to, then got confused because the interwiki special page didn't exist! (p.s. if you used that code then a user-right called "emperor" would be created, members of which could edit the interwiki table. You may also need to add <code>wfLoadExtension( 'Interwiki' );</code> because Extension:Interwiki is bundled with the version of MediaWiki this site uses but does not appear to be switched on.) I guess you could link wikilivres, but in no way is it essential. [[User:Dysklyver|Dysklyver]] ([[User talk:Dysklyver|talk]]) 13:44, 9 November 2018 (CST)


:Definitely ''not'' WikiAbuse III have no desire to replay that one! [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 18:30, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
::::Cool.  I think we're better off leaving it the way it is for now because it automatically updates with the defaults from MediaWiki.  [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 20:47, 13 November 2018 (CST)


===What are our rules for verifiability?===
==Extension:Collection==
I've written two modest statements at [[Encyc:Verifiability]] and [[Encyc:Point of view]]. I propose that some sort of verifiability requirement should be mandatory in the case of controversial and reverted material. At last resort, I believe that users who will not verify article claims may have to be booted, but first verifiability must be established as a background principle. [[User:One|One]] 01:04, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
Is anyone using this?  I am thinking of discontinuing it. [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 20:19, 21 January 2019 (CST)


I think that we should make sure not to say anything that is libellousEven if someone's real name is not used (hence avoiding legal repercussions), we should be careful not to say anything that is blatantly false either. If something is false by accident, that is fine, as it can be sorted out. I don't think that we are aiming to have another [[Encyclopaedia Dramatica]].  Opinions are good, of course, but in most cases they aren't really appropriate at all.  I suppose I have put a few opinions in here, but the majority of what I have said is fact.  Some of it can't be verified with links because the links were deleted, but they can be verified by agreed history and logic.  In my opinion, that is good enough. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 13:50, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
==Update notice==
We just updated the Mediawiki installationAs usual, if anyone notices any problems, please let me know. I ended up keeping the Collection extension. [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 12:27, 12 February 2019 (CST)


===How do we handle opinions in articles?===
==SSL Certificate==
Most of the articles on the MediaWiki Encyc have been written by a single user and are deeply infused with that user's point of view.
Encyc now has an SSL certificate.  There is something going on in images that is still triggering a warning, but I am hoping it will sort itself out as caches are cleared.  It might have something to do with how the parser generates links. [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 14:00, 12 February 2019 (CST)


First, I would like to say that Blissyu's efforts give this site a great running start of useful content. I really appreciate having him there. There are more stories in [[:Category:Former Wikipedia Reviewers]] than I was aware of or even imagined. That said, most articles on this site do not distinguish between fact, conjecture, and opinion.
:ok I figured out that last glitch.  All parts of Encyc are now secure and should present with a padlock and say your connection is secure. Please report any problems. [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 11:12, 4 March 2019 (CST)


I believe that the opinions of Blissyu and others can often be enlightening and welcome in articles. However, '''opinions must be identified as such'''. I therefore think that most the articles here will need an overhaul. To this end, I've created the {{tl|opinion}} tag for marking claims that are really just opinions. For example, a sentence that sounds like the author's opinion can be quickly tagged like {{tl|opinion|<nowiki>[[User:One]]</nowiki>}}.{{opinion|[[User:One]]}} Later, these sentences could be rewritten or evaluated by others later.
== Some interesting statistics ==


A related issue is when opinions are relevant to the subject. This is a more open question. For example, I think it's interesting that Blissyu (the former purported owner of WR) now thinks Guy and Poetlister could be socks. Should that go in the [[Poetlister]] article? I dunno, but it's not a black-and-white issue. It would be different if it were some random shmoe--like me. Blissy's opinion might matter, mine does not.  
Mobile clicks and desktop clicks are about even for this site. Please keep this in mind when writing articles. Use concise prose and simple formatting. Avoid huge tables such as this example: [[Wikipedia:Monofloral honey]].  We have a real opportunity here to be the mobile-friendly wiki that Wikipedia never was.


In any case, the first step is to mark these opinions ''as opinion''. [[User:One|One]] 01:04, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
Another cool stat. [[Les Golden]] is our most viewed page other than the main page.  It is closing in on 200,000 views.  Congratulations and thank you, Les.


As stated above, in the majority I stated fact, not opinion.  Where I did state opinions, I did so rather obviously.  For example, on my article on [[Igor Alexander]], it is my opinion that he couldn't possibly be [[Alex Linder]].  Who knows, maybe he is.  On the other hand, it is a fact that I owned [[Wikipedia Review]] until February 16th, 2008, and was still the owner as at when I was banned from there.  Some people, however, have stated that they don't accepted that to be fact.  I have displayed evidence that proves that (not to mention that it was never disputed by anyone and was claimed thousands of times over), yet some people don't accept that evidence and instead decide to pretend that it is opinion.  It is not opinion.  It is fact.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 13:53, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
[[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 09:53, 19 February 2019 (CST)


:I agree that most of what you've written strives for accuracy. The mass of content you  created is a good start, and it's the only reason I took notice of this site. But, for example, citing an edit history as "proof" that someone is Chip's sock cannot qualify as fact. It's the basis of an opinion. Most of the other opinions are of this type--not baseless, but not verified fact. //[[User talk:One|One]] 18:16, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
== New "Editor" group ==


::The answer to bad speech is more speech, right? Besides, I doubt that things like the history of Wikipedia Review matter much in the great scheme of thingsLet people have their opinions. [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 18:32, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
Following Abd's suggestion, I have created a group called "editor". This group is exempt from CAPTCHAsIn the future maybe it will have additional powers. [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 15:31, 21 May 2019 (CDT)
:A very good idea. [[User:Dysklyver|Dysklyver]] ([[User talk:Dysklyver|talk]]) 18:34, 16 June 2019 (CDT)


:::Good point there.  [[Janeyryan]] is not guaranteed to be [[Chip Berlet]].  They are, however, guaranteed to be an abusive user who, per Wikipedia's own rules should have been banned, and furthermore they are someone who acts with authority as if they were Chip Berlet.  If they are not Chip Berlet then if anything that is worse than if they were, because then they would be taking advantage of his position on Wikipedia but not actually having that position.  I thought that it was important to note this, although perhaps it could be written elsewhere.  I don't know if Janeyryan is being discussed on Wikipedia Review, but really it is easier to discuss it in a more thorough manner using a wiki.  There is nothing libellous or potentially libellous in that article, and it is obviously an opinion, so why is there an issue? [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 10:54, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
== Visual editor ==


===Is there some threshold of notability for articles?===
I highly suggest that at some point users can have access to a different editing tool known as the "visual editor". Wikipedia and many other wiki projects use it, and it is a better way to edit with more advanced tools to use. '''[[User:DoveWindsor|<span style="color:magenta">DoveWindsor</span>]]''' ([[User talk:DoveWindsor|Talk to me!]]) 05:52, 7 June 2019 (CDT)
For example, some edits suggest that there should only be articles for especially notable users on Wikipedia and WR. I tend to agree, but I propose that this threshold is fairly low. A few hundred WR posts, or opining on several WP controversies is enough that explaining the user's history would be helpful to readers and therefore worthy of an article here. [[User:One|One]] 01:10, 30 August 2008 (EDT)


I used my own guidelines, which I didn't really tell anyone before, but this is what they were:
:Three reasons I've passed on the Visual Editor so far.  The first is because pretty much everyone hates it.  The critical community has numerous threads pointing out its shortcomings, and the acceptance rate on Wikipedia is very low.  The second is because sometimes it introduces bugs to the wiki code that can be difficult for humans to clean up.  The third is technical.  It requires another extension and a Parsoid parser service.


Either:
:further reading: https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=2616  [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 07:38, 7 June 2019 (CDT)


# They have an existing article elsewhere that is popular and well known (e.g. on Wikipedia, Encyclopaedia Dramatica).
==Libregamewiki==
# They are/were a moderator/administrator/founding member of Wikipedia Review (there aren't that many of them).
Hello, fellow Encyclopedians! I started a new wiki project recently on 3 June 2019. So far, my wiki, Libergamewiki, has around 36 articles so far. I don't want to be the only editor there. I would truly appreciate it if anyone would be interested in volunteering to improve this new encyclopedia. The website link address is at: [http://libregamewiki.shoutwiki.com Official website] My username there is [[User:Libregamewiki]]. I would love to have some admins on board to patrol the wiki site, which I have the power to do. See you then!
# They were in the anti-cabal group of Wikipedia Review (most who were ended up as an admin at some point), which has its own rules for who is worthy (trustworthy, 500+ posts, liked by all).
# They had a notable argument with someone on Wikipedia Review (e.g. Malber, Amorrow, Grace Note).
# They are a notable administrator of Wikipedia (especially if they have their own sub section on Wikipedia Review).
# They are a Wikipedia user with more power than they should have (aka [[cabal]] member), e.g. [[Chip Berlet]], [[Antaeus Feldspar]], [[Lulu of the Lotus Eaters]].
# They are a sock puppet or suspected sock puppet of either a notable administrator or a user with more power than they should have (e.g. [[Janeyryan]], [[Sweet Blue Water]]).
# The article documented a well known controversy that might need to be explained.


I also left a clause in there that nobody's privacy would be invaded.  If someone made a credible argument that it was invading their privacy to have an article here, then that article could be deleted or else edited to protect their privacy. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 14:05, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
Libregamewiki - the free gaming encyclopedia! '''[[User:DoveWindsor|<span style="color:magenta">DoveWindsor</span>]]''' ([[User talk:DoveWindsor|Talk to me!]]) 16:24, 8 June 2019 (CDT)


:We're not paperAs long as our resources can keep up with it, I don't mind having an article about every single Wikipedian. What purpose does deleting such articles serve? [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 18:39, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
: Cool.  I registered. [[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 17:49, 8 June 2019 (CDT)


::Given that when you delete things they can be undeleted (and hence still take up the same space), I am not sure why there is a need to ever delete anything - EXCEPT for when it might be breaking a law.  I for one agree with the [[oversight]] command, although sadly it has been used abusively more often than responsibly (or at least it was in the beginning). I did wipe one particular article here for privacy concerns, and I have had an agreement that there is no point in having an article on [[Giggy]] as it seems that his role in trying to hurt me was accidental, and really he has no other claims to fame.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 10:56, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
==Pure Wiki Deletion==
Thanks to [[User:Abd]] for bringing this to our attention.  Pure Wiki Deletion was a failed proposal on Wikipedia to give ordinary users more control over the deletion process.
links:
* [[MediaWikiwiki:Extension:PureWikiDeletion]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Pure wiki deletion system]]
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_60#Pure_wiki_deletion,_redux]]


===BLP/name issues===
This looks like an interesting idea that never really made it to prime time. What do you think?
I propose that this site never include real names or purported real names of individuals. We should be here to document the struggles on these sites for the curious, not to ruin reputations. [[User:One|One]] 01:04, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
[[User:Auggie|Auggie]] ([[User talk:Auggie|talk]]) 13:17, 10 June 2019 (CDT)


I will clarify that, in general:
== P2P Foundation Wiki ==


People's real names will be given for one of the following reasons:
Feel free to check out [https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Main_Page this wiki] and find me, [https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Dove_Windsor Dove Windsor on P2P Foundation Wiki].


# They are a well known public figure, who is sufficiently notable to have an article on Wikipedia that uses their real name, and the article is talking about issues relating to them that describe things that are publicly attributed to their real name (e.g. we can talk about George W Bush on here happily).
==Update==
# They use their real name on the internet and are a notable person per above and do not have a pseudonym that they can go by. In these cases, however, we need to be extra careful about what we say about them.  This is why I prefer [[Snowspinner]] and [[Thekohser]] even though they do go by their real names.
Thank you everyone for your patience during Encyc's recent maintenance.  Encyc has been upgraded and now has Popups, which allows a preview of an article by hovering over a wikilink. [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 09:11, 10 December 2019 (CST)


People should not fear having their real names attributed to various things.  It is one thing to have people do a web search for "Blissyu2" get various nasty rumours and lies; quite another if that is your real name. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 14:09, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
==Dark theme==
A dark theme for the Vector skin is now available.  It makes the screen dark gray and the text white or orange.  Some people like it at night or anytime they want a less bright screen.  Matter of personal preference.


:I think these are good rules. //[[User talk:One|One]] 18:18, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
To use it go to Preferences --> Appearance --> Theme, and then select "dark" from the dropdown box. [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 08:59, 21 January 2020 (CST)


::Are we planning to be full of "various nasty rumours and lies"? [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 18:40, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
:Ok we're going to try this as a default for a while, for the desktop version.  Mobile is still the same light theme as before. [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 08:09, 20 February 2020 (CST)


:::I don't think that this would be a plan, no.  For one thing, that's what [[Encyclopaedia Dramatica]] is for, so why repeat it?  But sometimes, with all good intentions, you end up saying something which someone doesn't like.  That's the issue.  My point is that if we take the Snowspinner vs (his real name) example, Snowspinner the username has done a variety of despicable things, and of course he was the central figure in his own scandal.  It is quite reasonable to attribute those things to him the Wikipedia user.  On the other hand, I don't think that that should cost him a job or a relationship - unless of course he chooses to use his Wikipedia identity.  People from time to time look up on Google people's real names of people they know, even people they just met, to find out about them.  If they do that and suddenly find something like that, even though it might be true, well, it doesn't seem to me to be very fair.  Snowspinner isn't a public figure, he isn't George Bush, and so I don't think that he should be faced with the same things.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 10:59, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
::undid [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 08:42, 26 February 2020 (CST)


===What do we do about edit wars?===
:::Let's run this as default for a bit. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (CDT)
I'm not sure what to say here. We've already had edit wars, and Emperor apparently hopes to take a hands-off approach toward blocks. Any ideas? [[User:One|One]] 01:04, 30 August 2008 (EDT)


We haven't really had edit wars.  At worst, we have reverted once per day.  That's not really an edit war.  Ultimately some kind of an agreement has been reached.  Blocking should be reserved for people who are trying to destroy the site, not for people who want to have their opinions heard.  Every place I have managed I have said that I will only ban people who are trying to ruin the site.  You DO need to ban them.  You should NEVER ban people who are trying to make the place better, no matter how misguided they might be.  Unless of course you are trying to make it an exclusive club. Sadly, [[Jimbo Wales]] didn't set sensible rules when he started and hence Wikipedia was ruined when they ended up overdoing it.  There's nothing wrong with banning vandals, or people who are trying to ruin the place.  There is something wrong with banning people who are trying to help to make the site better.  Sadly, Wikipedia Review in many ways has gone down the same path.  There was nothing wrong with banning [[Malber]] and [[Grace Note]].  It probably would have been reasonable to have banned [[David Gerard]] and [[Snowspinner]], although we didn't.  We had to ban [[Amorrow]] for legal reasons.  But a number of the bans we made we really shouldn't have made.  Loyal trusted and well loved users were banned, which really wrecked the place.  Of course, it still has a reason for being, but it is being run very very badly.  Somey said that he would fix all of those problems but ultimately he made it worse. I hope that Emperor doesn't go down the same path.  Other than Grawp's silly renaming (I note that you can no longer move articles) there has been no reason to ban anyone here really. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 14:15, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
::::And back to light as default. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 08:49, 20 October 2020 (CDT)


:Actually Grawp's not even blocked anymore.  No one is.  I guess if things get really out of hand I can start swinging the banhammer, but even then I think the years-long indef. bans of Wikipedia are too draconianBesides, tracking down sockpuppets and block evaders seems like a big headache. [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 18:45, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
==Page previews==
Page previews can be enabled in preferences under the Appearance tabThis means if you hover over a link, a preview appears. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 18:56, 8 September 2020 (CDT)
Currently they are enabled by default. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 08:27, 9 September 2020 (CDT)


::What I think that Wikipedia should have done is to ban people outright.  No "banned for 1 day" nonsense - just ban them or don't ban them.  If you ban them for a while, then think that they deserve another chance, or they write to apologise, then unban them.  Bans should only ever be for when they are trying to wreck the project.  If someone who was trying to wreck the project and was banned for it comes on under a new username and isn't trying to wreck the project, it is utterly stupid to ban them. The whole concept of [[sock puppet]]ry is stupid.  It is one thing to punish people for using 2 accounts at once to rig votes and win edit wars - I agree with that.  But banning people for being suspected of being someone else who was banned, when the new person isn't doing anything wrong is utterly, utterly stupid.  They are almost always guesses anyway, and they get it wrong more often than they get it right.  What is the point?  It just creates a nasty air about it.  I am sure that that was not Jimbo's aim when he started it.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 11:03, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
==Timeless skin==
Timeless skin is now available as an option under preferences --> appearance. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 11:44, 15 October 2020 (CDT)


===Is a rule-based system the best way to run the Encyc MediaWiki?===
==Update to 1.35==
This is quite a Moulton-like question.  As Emperor, agreeing that rules will take priority over my whims is quite an idea! In some ways, this could make things harder, in that evil genius game-players would have an advantage over well-meaning mavericks. [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 18:28, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
As of this morning, we are now running Mediawiki 1.35.  I'm having a little trouble bringing the dark theme and popups back but everything else seems to be working fine.  As always, please let us know if you find problems.  Email [email protected]. Also check out the new Vector skin by going to preferences and disabling "legacy Vector". [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 11:56, 22 October 2020 (CDT)


:I have been to many internet projects over the years, from blog sites to muds to talkers to web forums to MMORPGs, to turn based online strategy games to real time strategy gamesIn the end, the majority of them put up 1 single page worth of rules. These rules will be decided on by the owner, although other people can advise themEven Blizzard only has guidelines, and at a whim any of their administrators can ban anyone at all for any reason at all, which basically is because they don't like them.  I have found so far 3 places that had what they pretended to be "laws", that went for more than 1 page.  They were: [[Live Journal]], a [[talker]] called Crystal Palace and [[Wikipedia]]In these cases, if someone was banned, their name was smeared forever, they would destroy their lives and so forthOf course, Live Journal at least kept their ban logs private, but [[LJ Drama]] would happily bash whoever got banned and make up stories about them, so it was just as bad. The worst of the lot was [[Wikipedia]].  The main reason why the smears are as bad as they are is because they pretend that they have real laws.  How many people who were banned from Wikipedia actually broke any of their rules?  How many people, who broke rules, are still there?  [[Janeyryan]] in almost every edit has broken a Wikipedia rule, yet is allowed to remain happily, while someone who didn't do a single thing against a single one of their rules got an indef ban after 8 productive months just because someone thought that they were me. 
:ok the update went fine except the Theme extension is not working rightOut of the box it was hard to get going on 1.33 so it's possible it just needs some tweaks, but I suspect something changed in 1.35 with how the css is appliedAt any rate, this might be a good time to learn how to make a custom skin because that would be a simpler solutionSo for the time being Theme will not be reinstalledPopups will remain off as well. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 19:52, 22 October 2020 (CDT)


I have also seen places that have no rules at allIn my opinion these places tend to be not quite as bad as the ones with huge rules, but are nonetheless worse than the ones with general guidelines. Usually 1 A4 page worth, with 10 1-line rules is a good way to go.
==Dark mode update==
I have decided to go a different route this time because it looks like [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Skin:DarkVector Skin:DarkVector] has improved since the last time I looked at it.  It is now installed and is an option for those who prefer a dark themeThere are some changes that still need to be made but they are mostly contrast issues in non-essential elements.  Look for subtle changes in the next few weeks. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 13:48, 26 October 2020 (CDT)


My rules for my MUD, as a guideline for you, are:
For those who do not wish to register an account, the dark mode can be viewed here: https://encyc.org/wiki/Briolette_of_India?useskin=darkvector [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 23:57, 26 October 2020 (CDT)


# Have fun.
==Popups are back==
# Do not ruin the fun of anyone else.
They are working now. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 08:43, 10 November 2020 (CST)
# Do not do anything that breaks any laws.  If in doubt, don't.
# Do not multiplay (if an imm, can have your imm and main character only).
# Do not cheat.  If in doubt, don't, per rule 3.
# Generally agree with the theme of the place and the idea of it.
# Do not give spoilers to people who don't want to know them (per rule 2).


Actually we only have 7 rules. I have never banned anyone, and have so far penalised 3 people - all for bug abuses.  In each case, I gave a warning and removed the advantages that they gained from the bug abuse. 
==User editing==
User editing is back on a trial basis. [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 09:50, 10 November 2020 (CST)


Something like that, or along those lines, is all that is requiredThese are, of course, guidelines. In the end, if someone went on there and started screaming out abuse to me and how much I suck, I would most likely ban them.  You don't need a rule to say that, you just do it.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 11:15, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
==Community Wishlist Survey 2021==
Our first ever [[Encyc:Community Wishlist Survey 2021|wishlist survey]] has begunIdeas welcome. [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 10:21, 25 November 2020 (CST)


===How can we best complement Wikipedia?===
==Moderation==
Although it claims to be the sum of knowledge, Wikipedia has effectively ceded whole areas of knowledge because of notability standards, deletionism, etcThere's an opportunity here to fill in the gaps.
Sorry but due to chronic vandalism we have had to install the Moderation extension.  New users can continue to edit articles, but their changes will not become public until a moderator approves themAnyone with an established record of responsible editing will be exempt from moderation by being placed in the "automoderated" group. If I have overlooked anyone, please let me know. [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 14:57, 2 December 2020 (CST)


In addition, Wikipedia is becoming clogged with mediaWe can avoid slow-loading pages and system demands by remaining text-only, while at the same time keeping operating expenses dirt cheap. [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 18:28, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
==IP editing==
IP editingGood idea or bad idea? [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 10:13, 21 December 2020 (CST)


RightI think that Wikipedia has 2 main weaknesses:
ok well we're trying it''Anyone can edit!'' [[User:Don|Don]] ([[User talk:Don|talk]]) 10:35, 21 December 2020 (CST)


# With regards to controversial and topical issues, they cannot hope to agree with [[NPOV]] and hence either adopt 1 POV or else they have a mixture of different ones, which makes it impossible to read and because of all of the focus on bias they often forget the factual accuracy of it.   
==Google hovering==
# There are a number of controlled articles that are perverted towards a false perspectiveWhilst the idea of a controlled article is fine in theory, what it needs to balance it is a controlled article that represents another perspective.
Now if you hover over links on Google searches you can see more of the content from Encyc articlesThis is true also for other wikis and other websitesWhen did this start happening? [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 11:52, 25 December 2020 (CST)


If we could have articles that dealt with these issues, then we would be set.
==Gentle reminder - Encyc BLP policy==
See [[Encyc:BLP]]


In other words, if we had articles on controversial and topical issues, that focussed on facts and didn't worry about whether it was biased or not, then we would be having more useful articles than the ones on Wikipedia areIf an article was controlled towards a false perspective and we were able to show a more accurate perspective, then that would be useful too.
==Maintenance advisory==
Just like Congress we are upgrading infrastructure.  Speed has been increased. Any problems (other than email which we know about) please notify [email protected]. [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 17:38, 9 August 2021 (EDT)
:OK the upgrades have been finishedSpeed and page experience are improved. [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 08:45, 8 October 2021 (EDT)


I don't know if that is what you are aiming for.  There are many weaknesses with Wikipedia, obviously.  But striving for such things as trying to do it better than Wikipedia does would be a good thing. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 11:20, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
== About page counts ==


===Who is our audience?===
Encyc pages have a note at the bottom: "This page has been accessed x times."
I'd like to write at a reading level below that of Wikipedia.  Not quite like Simple English, but I think that the academic-speak at Wikipedia has gone way overboard and made it much less useful as a general purpose encyclopedia than it used to be.  I've been thinking that it might be nice to aim towards the level of a bright high school student.  In this way even articles about mundane things like [[paper]] could end up being more useful here. [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 18:28, 30 August 2008 (EDT)


Simple English Wikipedia, in actual fact, writes in a far too complicated wayJust the same, if it was written to a level that the average person who would read it could understand it then that would be good.  Most of the time, Wikipedia is fineSometimes, though, it forces you to click on something else in order to understand it.  This should be avoided. Each article should stand alone.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 11:21, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
This used to be core functionality on MediaWiki but it was taken out a long time agoWe have been using the Hitcounters extension to keep page counts.  Anyway we have introduced a page caching system which will mean a lot of counts are missed. In particular, visitors who are not logged in will usually be served cached HTML instead of a page generated via PHP and the databaseWe can still use the numbers as a rough guide to how popular pages are, but the number needs to be viewed as a minimum.


==See also==
The upside of all this is that page load times are much faster and the overall user experience has been improved. [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 16:45, 19 October 2021 (EDT)
*[[Encyc:Verifiability]]
*[[Encyc:Point of view]]


[[Category:Encyc project‎]]
== Encyc - what is and isn't accepted ==
 
Hi Tom and admins,
 
I get the impression that this site works like https://en.everybodywiki.com/
 
Is Encyc stricter (or less strict) than Everybodywiki?
 
I'm trying to find wikis to write about some of my favorite websites and other topics, which Wikipedia wouldn't consider to be notable but would be perfectly fine on Everybodywiki, and hopefully also on Encyc.
 
I would like to be a productive community member, so let me know how I can help out. Thank you!
 
[[User:Smalltownguy|Smalltownguy]] ([[User talk:Smalltownguy|talk]]) 22:06, 23 November 2021 (EST)
 
 
: Hello Smalltownguy and welcome.  I think you're on the right track checking out [[Encyc:Policies]] and [[Encyc:Content]].  In some ways we are similar to Everybodywiki but in some ways different.  We are inclusionist in the sense that we have articles about small businesses (or larger ones that may not be recognized by western media outlets).  We also cover topics that Wikipedia might call fancruft and push off to Fandom (formerly known as Wikia).  It's ok if you want to write about hobbies like stamp collecting, Pokemon, or travel/tourism.  On the other hand, our [[Encyc:BLP]] policy is the toughest in the business.  We don't want to invade anyone's privacy, and so we don't publish articles about living people (with rare exceptions). In this way we are more deletionist than even Wikipedia and nowhere near as inclusionist as Everybodywiki.  Overall we try to resemble an old school encyclopedia like Britannica, so if someone is pushing the random button they aren't surprised by spam or things that don't belong.  And we really try not to harm anybody, so you might see admins intervene if things become heated or controversial because no one wants Encyc to be used as a platform to hurt anyone's feelings or ruin their fun.  We are the "kinder, gentler" encyclopedia. :)  Hope this helps.  [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 10:10, 24 November 2021 (EST)
 
::Thanks! In other words, be super nice and enjoy the inclusionism, but privacy and civility are of utmost importance. [[User:Smalltownguy|Smalltownguy]] ([[User talk:Smalltownguy|talk]]) 23:44, 24 November 2021 (EST)
 
== Update ==
 
Hi everybody and happy holidays.  Just a quick note that Encyc has been updated to the latest stable version of MediaWiki.  The only snag is that some of the Encyc-specific customizations to the DarkVector skin were lost (mainly color choices).  Not a big deal and I can probably go back and fix it at some point.  Definitely let me know if anyone is using DarkVector because I can make it more of a priority.
 
If there are any other problems, please let me know.  [[User:Tom|Tom]] ([[User talk:Tom|talk]]) 11:27, 9 December 2021 (EST)
 
== Extension:Collection ==
Collection was not working properly so I turned it off.  Nobody was using it anyway. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 13:52, 21 December 2021 (EST)
 
== Are wikis dying? ==
I just got back from some searching around the internet.  It's not looking good.  Been quiet here, and I don't think it's just us.  All the major wikis are facing declining participation.  Is it problems with the tech?  (e.g. poor organization, "digital tumbleweeds", "crowded attic" syndrome?, bad visual editors?)  Is it better alternatives? (what?).  Poor mobile accessiblity?  Communities too established already? (fear of joining?  toxic communities?)  I don't know.  I'm at a loss.  Anyone still stopping in wants to tell me what you think, feel free. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 23:19, 16 October 2022 (EDT)
 
== Happy holidays and an update ==
We just finished an update.  Everything worked except the DarkVector skin, unfortunately.  We will try to get that fixed but no guarantees.  An alternative dark theme is Citizen, which is installed and running ok.
 
Thank you to everyone who has participated over the years and to our lurkers too.  It has been almost 15 years, believe it or not.  Wishing everyone a Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, and a happy New Year. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 15:37, 23 December 2022 (EST)
 
== Vector 2022 ==
The news is that Wikipedia (en) will be switching their default desktop skin from Vector classic to Vector 2022 tomorrow, January 18, 2023. ([[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Vector 2022]])
 
Historically, we at Encyc have made efforts to stay as consistent as possible with Wikipedia, to make sharing articles back and forth between our two sites as seamless as possible.  However, in practice, we don't really do that all that often. 
 
So we have a choice:
# Continue with [[mediawikiwiki:Skin:Vector|Vector classic]], which will undoubtedly start to look a little dated
# Switch to [[mediawikiwiki:Skin:Vector/2022|Vector 2022]]
# Switch to [[mediawikiwiki:Skin:Citizen|Citizen]], a good-looking skin that automatically detects user preferences for light or dark mode and adjusts.
 
I am leaning towards option 3.  While trying to be consistent with Wikipedia is nice, I think it can also hold us back a bit.  With the Citizen skin, we have the opportunity make the site better-looking and more user-friendly than Wikipedia.  Whatever choice we make for the default, registered users will still be able to access all three skins via preferences. Any opinions? [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 13:35, 17 January 2023 (EST)
 
:Meh. Let's welcome Vector 2022 with Encyc Vector 2022, a worldwide celebration.  It's not every year that Wikipedia gets a new skin.  Cool. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 22:37, 17 January 2023 (EST)
 
== Cool new Microsoft Edge browser feature ==
So this last week we've been testing Encyc on various browsers.  Found this nifty feature on Microsoft Edge. Type <code> encyc.org france</code> into the browser bar and it will take you directly to our France page. This works not only for Encyc, but for other mediawiki sites like Citizendium and Rationalwiki. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 15:36, 20 January 2023 (EST)
 
== Citizen skin tip ==
For fans of the Citizen skin, there is a keyboard shortcut to search. Type "/" to search. No need to click the magnifying glass anymore. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 11:55, 3 February 2023 (EST)
 
== Miraheze ==
The wiki farm Miraheze is going through some turmoil.  There was an announcement that the site would be shutting down by the end of September 2023, which was quickly followed by an announcement that some former volunteers would be attempting to save the site or at least most of the content.
* [https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Miraheze_is_Not_Shutting_Dow Miraheze not shutting down notice]
* [https://meta.wikitide.com/wiki/WikiTide WikiTide]
 
Miraheze has been part of the wiki community for around eight years.  Although I never participated there, I am sad to see another MediaWiki site experiencing troubles.  We share some common goals as free educational resources. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 09:24, 19 June 2023 (EDT)
 
== website crawling but not indexing issue  ==
 
facing the issue with the website https://www.techradarto.com  search engine crawling the
entire site but some pages are not index .
 
using the google search console and check all technical things of site but not resolve.
robot.txt is not blocked .
 
== Affiliate links ==
Participation here has slowed down a bit so I'm going to run some affiliate links to help defray running costs.  Not expecting any significant money but if it turns into something we'll reevaluate. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 16:35, 14 August 2023 (EDT)
 
==Update==
We just updated to MediaWiki 1.39.5.  This is a long term support, or LTS version.
 
The Citizen skin went through a number of revisions and is looking really good, particularly in dark mode.  If you haven't checked it out, take a look.
 
As usual, report any problems here or to [email protected]. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 21:55, 29 September 2023 (EDT)
 
==Hey, where'd everybody go?==
Seems quiet. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 16:46, 17 May 2024 (EDT)
I know right. [[Special:Contributions/64.39.81.54|64.39.81.54]] 21:38, 23 May 2024 (EDT)
 
==Google algorithm==
I'm thinking of a new policy where we discourage mass imports from Wikipedia. I suspect they could be hurting our SEO. It's fine to import a couple of pages and make improvements to them. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 09:43, 27 September 2024 (EDT)
See also: [[Google algorithm]]. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 09:43, 27 September 2024 (EDT)
 
==Update==
We just updated to MediaWiki 1.42.3, the latest stable version. If there are any problems, please report them. [[User:Enki|Enki]] ([[User talk:Enki|talk]]) 15:05, 10 October 2024 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 14:05, 10 October 2024

Welcome to the Encyc community portal. This page serves as a central meeting place where Encyc users can get together and learn about current activities, group projects, and news.

Archives[edit]

Does this site[edit]

...Have an interwiki table? For reference it is generally found at Special:Interwiki, and only editable by adding $wgGroupPermissions['emperor']['interwiki'] = true; to the LocalSettings.php file. Dysklyver (talk) 09:51, 9 November 2018 (CST)

Well, Auggie no longer uses the Emperor account but let's not be too nitpicky ;) Alexander (talk) 10:14, 9 November 2018 (CST)
I think back when I set up the site I opted to go with the defaults rather than worrying about maintaining another table. I could look into it if you want to add something. What site were you thinking? Auggie (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2018 (CST)
I was doing interwiki links for wikilivres.org and I was wondering what sites (if any) you guys linked to, then got confused because the interwiki special page didn't exist! (p.s. if you used that code then a user-right called "emperor" would be created, members of which could edit the interwiki table. You may also need to add wfLoadExtension( 'Interwiki' ); because Extension:Interwiki is bundled with the version of MediaWiki this site uses but does not appear to be switched on.) I guess you could link wikilivres, but in no way is it essential. Dysklyver (talk) 13:44, 9 November 2018 (CST)
Cool. I think we're better off leaving it the way it is for now because it automatically updates with the defaults from MediaWiki. Auggie (talk) 20:47, 13 November 2018 (CST)

Extension:Collection[edit]

Is anyone using this? I am thinking of discontinuing it. Auggie (talk) 20:19, 21 January 2019 (CST)

Update notice[edit]

We just updated the Mediawiki installation. As usual, if anyone notices any problems, please let me know. I ended up keeping the Collection extension. Auggie (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2019 (CST)

SSL Certificate[edit]

Encyc now has an SSL certificate. There is something going on in images that is still triggering a warning, but I am hoping it will sort itself out as caches are cleared. It might have something to do with how the parser generates links. Auggie (talk) 14:00, 12 February 2019 (CST)

ok I figured out that last glitch. All parts of Encyc are now secure and should present with a padlock and say your connection is secure. Please report any problems. Auggie (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2019 (CST)

Some interesting statistics[edit]

Mobile clicks and desktop clicks are about even for this site. Please keep this in mind when writing articles. Use concise prose and simple formatting. Avoid huge tables such as this example: Wikipedia:Monofloral honey. We have a real opportunity here to be the mobile-friendly wiki that Wikipedia never was.

Another cool stat. Les Golden is our most viewed page other than the main page. It is closing in on 200,000 views. Congratulations and thank you, Les.

Auggie (talk) 09:53, 19 February 2019 (CST)

New "Editor" group[edit]

Following Abd's suggestion, I have created a group called "editor". This group is exempt from CAPTCHAs. In the future maybe it will have additional powers. Auggie (talk) 15:31, 21 May 2019 (CDT)

A very good idea. Dysklyver (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2019 (CDT)

Visual editor[edit]

I highly suggest that at some point users can have access to a different editing tool known as the "visual editor". Wikipedia and many other wiki projects use it, and it is a better way to edit with more advanced tools to use. DoveWindsor (Talk to me!) 05:52, 7 June 2019 (CDT)

Three reasons I've passed on the Visual Editor so far. The first is because pretty much everyone hates it. The critical community has numerous threads pointing out its shortcomings, and the acceptance rate on Wikipedia is very low. The second is because sometimes it introduces bugs to the wiki code that can be difficult for humans to clean up. The third is technical. It requires another extension and a Parsoid parser service.
further reading: https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=2616 Auggie (talk) 07:38, 7 June 2019 (CDT)

Libregamewiki[edit]

Hello, fellow Encyclopedians! I started a new wiki project recently on 3 June 2019. So far, my wiki, Libergamewiki, has around 36 articles so far. I don't want to be the only editor there. I would truly appreciate it if anyone would be interested in volunteering to improve this new encyclopedia. The website link address is at: Official website My username there is User:Libregamewiki. I would love to have some admins on board to patrol the wiki site, which I have the power to do. See you then!

Libregamewiki - the free gaming encyclopedia! DoveWindsor (Talk to me!) 16:24, 8 June 2019 (CDT)

Cool. I registered. Auggie (talk) 17:49, 8 June 2019 (CDT)

Pure Wiki Deletion[edit]

Thanks to User:Abd for bringing this to our attention. Pure Wiki Deletion was a failed proposal on Wikipedia to give ordinary users more control over the deletion process. links:

This looks like an interesting idea that never really made it to prime time. What do you think? Auggie (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2019 (CDT)

P2P Foundation Wiki[edit]

Feel free to check out this wiki and find me, Dove Windsor on P2P Foundation Wiki.

Update[edit]

Thank you everyone for your patience during Encyc's recent maintenance. Encyc has been upgraded and now has Popups, which allows a preview of an article by hovering over a wikilink. Tom (talk) 09:11, 10 December 2019 (CST)

Dark theme[edit]

A dark theme for the Vector skin is now available. It makes the screen dark gray and the text white or orange. Some people like it at night or anytime they want a less bright screen. Matter of personal preference.

To use it go to Preferences --> Appearance --> Theme, and then select "dark" from the dropdown box. Tom (talk) 08:59, 21 January 2020 (CST)

Ok we're going to try this as a default for a while, for the desktop version. Mobile is still the same light theme as before. Tom (talk) 08:09, 20 February 2020 (CST)
undid Tom (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2020 (CST)
Let's run this as default for a bit. Don (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2020 (CDT)
And back to light as default. Don (talk) 08:49, 20 October 2020 (CDT)

Page previews[edit]

Page previews can be enabled in preferences under the Appearance tab. This means if you hover over a link, a preview appears. Don (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2020 (CDT) Currently they are enabled by default. Don (talk) 08:27, 9 September 2020 (CDT)

Timeless skin[edit]

Timeless skin is now available as an option under preferences --> appearance. Don (talk) 11:44, 15 October 2020 (CDT)

Update to 1.35[edit]

As of this morning, we are now running Mediawiki 1.35. I'm having a little trouble bringing the dark theme and popups back but everything else seems to be working fine. As always, please let us know if you find problems. Email [email protected]. Also check out the new Vector skin by going to preferences and disabling "legacy Vector". Tom (talk) 11:56, 22 October 2020 (CDT)

ok the update went fine except the Theme extension is not working right. Out of the box it was hard to get going on 1.33 so it's possible it just needs some tweaks, but I suspect something changed in 1.35 with how the css is applied. At any rate, this might be a good time to learn how to make a custom skin because that would be a simpler solution. So for the time being Theme will not be reinstalled. Popups will remain off as well. Don (talk) 19:52, 22 October 2020 (CDT)

Dark mode update[edit]

I have decided to go a different route this time because it looks like Skin:DarkVector has improved since the last time I looked at it. It is now installed and is an option for those who prefer a dark theme. There are some changes that still need to be made but they are mostly contrast issues in non-essential elements. Look for subtle changes in the next few weeks. Don (talk) 13:48, 26 October 2020 (CDT)

For those who do not wish to register an account, the dark mode can be viewed here: https://encyc.org/wiki/Briolette_of_India?useskin=darkvector Don (talk) 23:57, 26 October 2020 (CDT)

Popups are back[edit]

They are working now. Don (talk) 08:43, 10 November 2020 (CST)

User editing[edit]

User editing is back on a trial basis. Don (talk) 09:50, 10 November 2020 (CST)

Community Wishlist Survey 2021[edit]

Our first ever wishlist survey has begun. Ideas welcome. Tom (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2020 (CST)

Moderation[edit]

Sorry but due to chronic vandalism we have had to install the Moderation extension. New users can continue to edit articles, but their changes will not become public until a moderator approves them. Anyone with an established record of responsible editing will be exempt from moderation by being placed in the "automoderated" group. If I have overlooked anyone, please let me know. Tom (talk) 14:57, 2 December 2020 (CST)

IP editing[edit]

IP editing. Good idea or bad idea? Don (talk) 10:13, 21 December 2020 (CST)

ok well we're trying it. Anyone can edit! Don (talk) 10:35, 21 December 2020 (CST)

Google hovering[edit]

Now if you hover over links on Google searches you can see more of the content from Encyc articles. This is true also for other wikis and other websites. When did this start happening? Tom (talk) 11:52, 25 December 2020 (CST)

Gentle reminder - Encyc BLP policy[edit]

See Encyc:BLP

Maintenance advisory[edit]

Just like Congress we are upgrading infrastructure. Speed has been increased. Any problems (other than email which we know about) please notify [email protected]. Tom (talk) 17:38, 9 August 2021 (EDT)

OK the upgrades have been finished. Speed and page experience are improved. Tom (talk) 08:45, 8 October 2021 (EDT)

About page counts[edit]

Encyc pages have a note at the bottom: "This page has been accessed x times."

This used to be core functionality on MediaWiki but it was taken out a long time ago. We have been using the Hitcounters extension to keep page counts. Anyway we have introduced a page caching system which will mean a lot of counts are missed. In particular, visitors who are not logged in will usually be served cached HTML instead of a page generated via PHP and the database. We can still use the numbers as a rough guide to how popular pages are, but the number needs to be viewed as a minimum.

The upside of all this is that page load times are much faster and the overall user experience has been improved. Tom (talk) 16:45, 19 October 2021 (EDT)

Encyc - what is and isn't accepted[edit]

Hi Tom and admins,

I get the impression that this site works like https://en.everybodywiki.com/

Is Encyc stricter (or less strict) than Everybodywiki?

I'm trying to find wikis to write about some of my favorite websites and other topics, which Wikipedia wouldn't consider to be notable but would be perfectly fine on Everybodywiki, and hopefully also on Encyc.

I would like to be a productive community member, so let me know how I can help out. Thank you!

Smalltownguy (talk) 22:06, 23 November 2021 (EST)


Hello Smalltownguy and welcome. I think you're on the right track checking out Encyc:Policies and Encyc:Content. In some ways we are similar to Everybodywiki but in some ways different. We are inclusionist in the sense that we have articles about small businesses (or larger ones that may not be recognized by western media outlets). We also cover topics that Wikipedia might call fancruft and push off to Fandom (formerly known as Wikia). It's ok if you want to write about hobbies like stamp collecting, Pokemon, or travel/tourism. On the other hand, our Encyc:BLP policy is the toughest in the business. We don't want to invade anyone's privacy, and so we don't publish articles about living people (with rare exceptions). In this way we are more deletionist than even Wikipedia and nowhere near as inclusionist as Everybodywiki. Overall we try to resemble an old school encyclopedia like Britannica, so if someone is pushing the random button they aren't surprised by spam or things that don't belong. And we really try not to harm anybody, so you might see admins intervene if things become heated or controversial because no one wants Encyc to be used as a platform to hurt anyone's feelings or ruin their fun. We are the "kinder, gentler" encyclopedia. :) Hope this helps. Tom (talk) 10:10, 24 November 2021 (EST)
Thanks! In other words, be super nice and enjoy the inclusionism, but privacy and civility are of utmost importance. Smalltownguy (talk) 23:44, 24 November 2021 (EST)

Update[edit]

Hi everybody and happy holidays. Just a quick note that Encyc has been updated to the latest stable version of MediaWiki. The only snag is that some of the Encyc-specific customizations to the DarkVector skin were lost (mainly color choices). Not a big deal and I can probably go back and fix it at some point. Definitely let me know if anyone is using DarkVector because I can make it more of a priority.

If there are any other problems, please let me know. Tom (talk) 11:27, 9 December 2021 (EST)

Extension:Collection[edit]

Collection was not working properly so I turned it off. Nobody was using it anyway. Enki (talk) 13:52, 21 December 2021 (EST)

Are wikis dying?[edit]

I just got back from some searching around the internet. It's not looking good. Been quiet here, and I don't think it's just us. All the major wikis are facing declining participation. Is it problems with the tech? (e.g. poor organization, "digital tumbleweeds", "crowded attic" syndrome?, bad visual editors?) Is it better alternatives? (what?). Poor mobile accessiblity? Communities too established already? (fear of joining? toxic communities?) I don't know. I'm at a loss. Anyone still stopping in wants to tell me what you think, feel free. Enki (talk) 23:19, 16 October 2022 (EDT)

Happy holidays and an update[edit]

We just finished an update. Everything worked except the DarkVector skin, unfortunately. We will try to get that fixed but no guarantees. An alternative dark theme is Citizen, which is installed and running ok.

Thank you to everyone who has participated over the years and to our lurkers too. It has been almost 15 years, believe it or not. Wishing everyone a Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, and a happy New Year. Enki (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2022 (EST)

Vector 2022[edit]

The news is that Wikipedia (en) will be switching their default desktop skin from Vector classic to Vector 2022 tomorrow, January 18, 2023. (wikipedia:Wikipedia:Vector 2022)

Historically, we at Encyc have made efforts to stay as consistent as possible with Wikipedia, to make sharing articles back and forth between our two sites as seamless as possible. However, in practice, we don't really do that all that often.

So we have a choice:

  1. Continue with Vector classic, which will undoubtedly start to look a little dated
  2. Switch to Vector 2022
  3. Switch to Citizen, a good-looking skin that automatically detects user preferences for light or dark mode and adjusts.

I am leaning towards option 3. While trying to be consistent with Wikipedia is nice, I think it can also hold us back a bit. With the Citizen skin, we have the opportunity make the site better-looking and more user-friendly than Wikipedia. Whatever choice we make for the default, registered users will still be able to access all three skins via preferences. Any opinions? Enki (talk) 13:35, 17 January 2023 (EST)

Meh. Let's welcome Vector 2022 with Encyc Vector 2022, a worldwide celebration. It's not every year that Wikipedia gets a new skin. Cool. Enki (talk) 22:37, 17 January 2023 (EST)

Cool new Microsoft Edge browser feature[edit]

So this last week we've been testing Encyc on various browsers. Found this nifty feature on Microsoft Edge. Type encyc.org france into the browser bar and it will take you directly to our France page. This works not only for Encyc, but for other mediawiki sites like Citizendium and Rationalwiki. Enki (talk) 15:36, 20 January 2023 (EST)

Citizen skin tip[edit]

For fans of the Citizen skin, there is a keyboard shortcut to search. Type "/" to search. No need to click the magnifying glass anymore. Enki (talk) 11:55, 3 February 2023 (EST)

Miraheze[edit]

The wiki farm Miraheze is going through some turmoil. There was an announcement that the site would be shutting down by the end of September 2023, which was quickly followed by an announcement that some former volunteers would be attempting to save the site or at least most of the content.

Miraheze has been part of the wiki community for around eight years. Although I never participated there, I am sad to see another MediaWiki site experiencing troubles. We share some common goals as free educational resources. Enki (talk) 09:24, 19 June 2023 (EDT)

website crawling but not indexing issue[edit]

facing the issue with the website https://www.techradarto.com search engine crawling the entire site but some pages are not index .

using the google search console and check all technical things of site but not resolve. robot.txt is not blocked .

Affiliate links[edit]

Participation here has slowed down a bit so I'm going to run some affiliate links to help defray running costs. Not expecting any significant money but if it turns into something we'll reevaluate. Enki (talk) 16:35, 14 August 2023 (EDT)

Update[edit]

We just updated to MediaWiki 1.39.5. This is a long term support, or LTS version.

The Citizen skin went through a number of revisions and is looking really good, particularly in dark mode. If you haven't checked it out, take a look.

As usual, report any problems here or to [email protected]. Enki (talk) 21:55, 29 September 2023 (EDT)

Hey, where'd everybody go?[edit]

Seems quiet. Enki (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2024 (EDT) I know right. 64.39.81.54 21:38, 23 May 2024 (EDT)

Google algorithm[edit]

I'm thinking of a new policy where we discourage mass imports from Wikipedia. I suspect they could be hurting our SEO. It's fine to import a couple of pages and make improvements to them. Enki (talk) 09:43, 27 September 2024 (EDT) See also: Google algorithm. Enki (talk) 09:43, 27 September 2024 (EDT)

Update[edit]

We just updated to MediaWiki 1.42.3, the latest stable version. If there are any problems, please report them. Enki (talk) 15:05, 10 October 2024 (EDT)