Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help
Community portal
Encyc
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
BLP
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== BLP manipulation on Wikipedia == Prior to the introduction of the BLP policy on Wikipedia, people could write articles on pretty much anyone for pretty much any reason. Nobody really took the articles overly seriously since, fundamentally, Wikipedia's current issue articles are appallingly bad, and always have been. The only exceptions were their articles about movie stars, TV shows and musicians, and even then on any controversial or otherwise important issues they were appallingly terrible. Articles on politicians and important people have always been appalling. Without BLP, nobody thought to treat Wikipedia's articles about living people seriously. Sure, so the Wikipedia faithful would insist that they were good, but anyone with any intelligence would know that they were pretty woeful. People took these articles with a grain of salt, as it were. They weren't taken very seriously. Inaccuracies about living people were Wikipedia's laughing stock and there was talk of removing them entirely. Now that BLP has been introduced, most articles about living people have the look and feel of Wikipedia's more accurate articles - about TV shows, movies, music, games and celebrities. And yet they are still just as bad as they have ever been. Because of the supposed faith in BLP, which, thanks largely to Daniel Brandt, is also shared by and large on critic sites such as [[Wikipedia Review]], Wikipedia's appallingly bad articles about living people that matter are now given far more credibility than they deserve. People take them seriously, since, per BLP, hey they can't be wrong. And yet a lot of people don't realise that BLP was never the main problem. BLP only addresses whether or not something is libellous - it in no way addresses the much more important issue of [[truth changing]]. BLP actually makes Wikipedia's ability to change truth a lot worse. Thanks to BLP, efforts to stop truth changing on Wikipedia, to expose Wikipedia lies or in any way to stop the horrendous [[cabal]]-like infrastructure is more difficult than it has ever been. [[Jimbo Wales]], the founder of Wikipedia, has even gone on record to say that there is a cabal and he likes it that way, and, in light of BLP, he thinks that it is a good thing.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Encyc are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License (see
Encyc:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Toggle limited content width