Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help
Community portal
Encyc
Search
Search
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Moon Hoax
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Poll results=== On 14 June 1970, Knight Newspapers polled 1721 people in six US cities and found that more than 30% were "suspicious of NASA's trips to the Moon" with the number rising to 54% in some Afro-American areas.<ref name="wired"/><ref name="Kaysing">B. Kaysing, R. Reid, [http://books.google.com?id=N1Gcfdj81T4C We never went to the Moon], Health Research Books, 1976, ISBN 9780787304874</ref><sup>[http://books.google.com?id=N1Gcfdj81T4C&pg=PA5 (pp. 3, 5)]</sup><ref name="age">[http://history.nasa.gov/Remembering_Space_Age_B.pdf Remembrance and cultural representation of the Space Age], NASA, p. 378</ref> And on 4 November 2002, the Italian daily "Corriere della sera" reported that 68% of the non-white US population do not believe NASA.<ref name="moongate">[http://nexusedizioni.it?option=com_content&task=view&id=81 Moongate: A bomb ready to explode?], S. Colzani, 16/2/05 (It.)</ref> The following table lists a score of public opinion survey results. The "sceptics" column shows the percentage of people who doubt or deny that men walked on the Moon. {|width="100%" |- | {|class="TablePager" |+<big>'''Closed access polls'''</big> |- !Organisation !Year !Country !Age !Sceptics |- |Knight Newspapers, Inc. |1970 |USA |N.A. |30%<ref name="wired"/> |- |Gallup, Inc. |1976 |USA |N.A. |28%<ref name="sdg"/> |- |The Washington Post |1994 |USA |N.A. |30%<ref name="moongate"/> |- |Public Opinion Fund |2000 |Russia |N.A. |28%<ref>[http://bd.fom.ru/report/cat/sci_sci/kosmos/of001605 Were the Americans on the Moon?], A. Petrova, 19/4/00 (Rus.)</ref> |- |Fox TV |2001 |USA |N.A. |20%<ref name="desert">[http://deseretnews.com/article/946348/ Book to confirm Moon landings], S. Borenstein, 2/11/02</ref> |- |Dittmar Associates, Inc. |2006 |USA |18–25 |27%<ref>[http://boeing.com/defense-space/space/constellation/references/reports/Engaging_the_18-25_Generation.pdf Engaging the 18–25 generation: Educational outreach, interactive technologies, and space], M. Dittmar, 25/9/06, p. 6</ref> |- |Unspecified |2008 |USA |N.A. |28%<ref>[http://somethingawful.com/d/news/election-facts-data.php?page=2 Overlooked election facts & statistics], Z. Parsons, 8/2/08</ref> |- |20th Century Fox |2008 |UK |Adults |35±5%<ref>[http://news.sky.com/skynews/Article/200807415061467 Area 51 is top conspiracy theory], Sky News, 31/7/08</ref><ref>[http://guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/jul/31/1 US base leads poll's top conspiracy theories], The Guardian, 31/7/08</ref><ref>[http://thaindian.com/newsportal/world/50pct_10078317.html 50pct Britons believe in captive space aliens], ANI, 31/7/08</ref> |- |Unspecified |2009 |USA |N.A. |22%<ref name="mirror">[http://mirror.co.uk/a/115875-21123653/ The Dark Side of the Moon: 40 years after Moon landing the doubts persist], D. Ellam, 14/2/09</ref><ref name="express">[http://dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/114552 Moonfakers], P. Sheridan, 17/7/09</ref> |- |Engineering & Technology magazine |2009 |UK |16–64 |25%<ref>[http://kn.theiet.org/news/jul09/moon-landing-survey.cfm Britons question Apollo 11 Moon landings, survey reveals], E&T, 8/7/09</ref> |} | {|class="TablePager" |+<big>'''Open access polls'''</big> |- !Source !Year(s) !Language !Attendance !Sceptics |- |Spiegel TV |2001+ |German |≈5000 |47%<ref>[http://www1.spiegel.de/active/vote/fcgi/vote.fcgi?voteid=1060 Ein kosmischer Streit / Hat die erste Mondlandung überhaup stattgefunden?], Der Spiegel (Ger.)</ref> † |- |Sparklit Networks |2002+ |English |≈7000 |41%<ref>[http://vote.sparklit.com/poll.spark/626608 Did we land on the Moon?], Sparklit.com</ref> |- |BBC |2003–2004 |English |≈20000 |41%<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/bbc.co.uk/science/space/solarsystem/earth/moonvote.shtml?displayresults=1&configfile=space_moonvote.xml Did we really land on the Moon?], BBC, 28/4/05</ref> |- |Alex Dantart<ref>[http://dantart.es Alex Dantart], 17/5/08 (Sp.)</ref> |2007+ |Spanish |≈3000 |53%<ref>[http://86400.es/2007/01/16/el El hombre llegó a la Luna... ¿o no?], A. Dantart, 16/1/07 (Sp.)</ref> |- |PourOuContre.com |2007+ |French |≈1700 |62%<ref>[http://www.pouroucontre.com/cgi-file/vote.cgi?num=56922 Pensez-vous que l'homme a marché sur la lune?], PourOuContre.com (Fr.)</ref> |- |20 Minuten daily |2009+ |French |(to be added) |45%<ref>[http://20min.ch/community/poll/?pollid=10132 L'Homme a-t-il marché sur la Lune?], 20Minuten.ch (Fr.)</ref> |- |Aftonbladet daily |2009+ |Swedish |≈75000 |40%<ref>[http://aftonbladet.se/vss/special/storfragan/visa/0,,41250,0.html Do you think the first Moon landing was a scam?], Aftonbladet, 15/7/09 (Sw.)</ref> |- |CNews.ru on-line daily |2009 |Russian |≈5500 |49%<ref>[http://rnd.cnews.ru/inc/poll/archive.php?p=7 Archive of polls], CNews.ru (Rus.)</ref> |- |Twiigs, LLC |2009 |English |≈1400 |42%<ref>[http://twiigs.com/poll/Technology/35897 Do you think the government could fake a Moon landing?], Twiigs.com, 20/7—19/8/09</ref> |- |PlanetMars.org |2009+ |English |≈2000 |37%<ref>[http://planetmars.org/modules.php?name=Surveys&pollID=3 Did we land on the Moon in 1969?], E. Wieder, PlanetMars.org</ref> |} |} † German astronaut Prof. Dr Ulrich Walter noted that the percentage of sceptics increased from 36% in 2002 to 44% just two years later.<ref name="Walter"/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Encyc are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License (see
Encyc:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
This page is a member of a hidden category:
Category:Pages using ISBN magic links
Toggle limited content width